CONTENT & ASSESSMENTS
Exams, Quizzes, and Assessments
Offering exams and assessments in an online environment presents different opportunities and considerations. Learn tips, best practices, and alternative strategies to promote learning and maintain the spirit and values of the College of Engineering Honor Code.
Online Assessment Strategies
Alternative strategies for content, assessment, assignments, and exams are encouraged in online teaching and learning. These strategies can range from adjusting the format of a final exam to incorporating alternative methods of measuring student learning. This page offers strategies, tips, and examples to help you design your assessment.
Develop Your Online Assessment Strategy
Consider the Purpose of Your Assessment
- Which type of assessments best align with my overall learning objectives?
- Is this a background knowledge check, an engagement check, or a knowledge check designed to gauge learner understanding?
- Does my assessment plan consist of traditional exams, projects, alternative assessments, or a blended assessment approach?
- How can I transition my in-person exam strategies to an online environment?
- How can I demonstrate engagement in the course even if it’s not an exam week?
- How can I let learners know how they’re doing and identify those that need help?
- How can I format my remote office hours to provide additional support and gauge learner progress?
Think About Ways to Adjust the Following Variables
- Frequency: Consider creating more frequent quizzes to gain early feedback on student learning.
- Weight: Consider lowering the weight of exams, increasing weight of projects.
- Delivery: Design exams to be delivered asynchronously and untimed.
- Design: Use alternative assessments which require original thought, reflection, and application of concepts.
Keep Academic Integrity In Mind
Incorporate best practices for remote exams and assessments to help ensure adherence to CoE Honor Code.
Learn more about supporting Academic Integrity.
Tips for Designing Assessments
Here are some tips to promote student learning in the remote environment and maintain the spirit and values of the College of Engineering Honor Code.
Be Clear About Assessment Details and Objectives
- Provide specific and descriptive criteria for the evaluation of learners’ work that is tied to course learning objectives and grading policies.
- Write online activities and assignments with explicit instructions for how to participate, when responses or submissions are expected and in what form (e.g., pdf, image, video), and how the activities are assessed.
Encourage Demonstration of Knowledge
- Use learning activities and assessments to stimulate learner interactions with the course content.
- For exams and quizzes, consider an open book/open note approach.
- Design questions such that they require reflection, application, citation of research, or demonstrated understanding beyond textbook concepts or rote memorization.
- Use methods that require learners to demonstrate their work, such as an uploaded video explanation or handwritten answers.
- Incorporate synchronous review sessions with the capability to accommodate different time zones if necessary.
Consider Exam Setup and Delivery
- Incorporate randomized questions from question banks/groups. To learn more, view this presentation on using Canvas tools to support academic integrity.
- Control release of student grades for assignments such that all student get their grades at the same time.
- Make exam files only accessible during the test time window.
- Add an Honor Code statement to all assessments with submissions.
Consider Alternative Assessments
Incorporate alternative assessment strategies to assess learning comprehension.
Instead of standard methods such as multiple choice, true/false, or short-answer tests, ask learners to explain the process used to answer a question, apply learning to a personal experience, videotape their solution, incorporate a team-based project involving a virtual team, etc.
Online Quizzes & Exams
Watch tutorials and access resources covering options, tips, and best practices for offering online quizzes and exams.
Exams and assessments are a large part of how we measure learner success. For courses with online learners, several options are available for offering quizzes and exams. The following videos will guide you through these options and associated processes.
Training: Offering Quizzes & Exams Remotely
In this 50-minute training session, Pat Hammett, PhD covers a range of options and best practices for offering assessments remotely, including:
- Options for offering remote exams
- Past experiences offering remote exams
- Using Canvas for enhanced online exams
- Tips for grading online submissions using Canvas
Tutorial: Offering Quizzes & Exams Remotely
For a shorter tutorial on offering assessments remotely. (30 minutes)
Tutorial: Creating Canvas Quizzes/Exams with the Upload File Option
In this ~5-minute tutorial, an instructional designer guides you through the process for creating quizzes/exams in Canvas, including:
- How to create a Canvas Quiz
- How to create a quiz question using file upload
- How to publish the quiz
Recommendations & Resources
Review Guidelines and Minimum Quality Standards
Consider Exam Setup and Delivery
- Incorporate randomized questions from question banks/groups.
- Control release of learner grades for assignments such that all learners get their grades at the same time.
- Make exam files only accessible during the test time window.
- Add an Honor Code statement to all assessments with submissions.
- To learn more about using Canvas tools to support academic integrity, download or view this presentation.
Scale Online Exams in High-Enrollment Courses
- Prescribe a clear format, rubric, points value, and structure, so the exam can be graded quickly and across multiple graders.
- Provide an easy place within your course site/LMS to post and retrieve the exam.
- Utilize question banks.
- Assess groups of learners in waves.
Design Quiz or Exam in an Open Note/Open Book Format
- Without proctors, one may expect some students to use their notes. Consider acknowledging this limitation and allowing access to notes for everybody.
- Clearly articulate what is considered a “note” or an appropriate resource to use.
- Clearly articulate prohibited resources (e.g. soliciting help online).
Take Timing into Consideration
- Consider using an online platform to administer and time the exam.
- Limit the time allotted for students to take an exam to at most 2 hours.
- Moderate exam length such that most students can comfortably finish.
Accommodate Learners in Multiple Time Zones
- Establish a time that is reasonable for all time zones represented in your class, or offer exams at multiple times (especially if your class includes international students).
- Be aware that multiple exam times might require multiple exam versions or other mitigation strategies.
Have a Contingency Plan for Technical Issues
- To help reduce stress, provide students with contact information (e.g. phone number) in the event that there are technical or other issues during the exam.
- Plan for alternative methods of submitting exams.
Exams aren’t the only way to evaluate learner success. Here are examples of alternative assessment strategies that require original thought, reflection and application of concepts.
Blogs offer a unique, interactive method of assessing student progress and retention. Require learners to write and publish regular posts on a concept or topic and encourage peers to provide feedback in the comments section of the posts.
Blogger – Available to all learners and instructors under the U-M Google Suite license.
Ask learners to write descriptions about the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited around a particular topic, discipline, method, or innovation.
Annotated Bibliography Samples (Purdue Online Writing Lab)
Task learners with interviewing a practitioner, researcher, or someone from another discipline to identify how certain technology, engineering practices, etc. are being used, and to reflect on gaps, user behavior, areas for improvement or future research.
Design an assessment that requires learners to apply existing concepts to a new discipline or audience, and consider how it would need to be adapted to meet new needs, or opportunities that could arise.
Encourage applied thinking by asking learners to create a guide explaining a concept, technology, technique to someone outside the discipline.
Assignment and Rubric
Flip the script by asking learners to design an assignment and rubric aimed at assessing someone’s understanding of a specific concept, technology, or lab technique. Ask learners to clearly define how they will know if the assignment-taker has mastered the concept, demonstrated competency, or needs improvement.
Solution to a Current Event
Ask learners to apply a concept from the course to address a current event or a gap/problem that impacts people daily, including describing how to implement, distribute, or develop solutions.
Design an assignment such that learners must demonstrate a “hack” that makes a technique, strategy, technology, or engineering solution more accessible to a wider audience, perhaps by price point.
Service to the Greater Good
Encourage system thinking by requiring learners to describe or demonstrate how a particular technology or engineering system serves a greater good or has a wider impact.
Assignments & Grading
In an online learning environment, assignments offer a great way to keep learners engaged, check their progress, and encourage peer collaboration. As you plan your course, consider the tips and recommendations below.
Homework, Projects, and Presentations
For courses with online learners, it is important to post assignments in your course learning management system and provide learners with explicit instructions about how to title the assignments and where to submit them. Electronic submission may involve either uploading the document in an easily-opened format (.doc, .pdf, etc.) or scanning hand-written work.
- Tutorial: Scanning Documents to PDF with iPhone
In this 3-minute video, an instructional designer shows you how to scan documents to PDF using an iPhone.
- Tutorial: Scanning Documents to PDF with Android
In this 2-minute video, an instructional designer shows you how to scan documents to PDF using an Android phone.
Group Work and Learner Presentations
To accommodate time zone differences, consider designing group work that requires asynchronous collaboration. You may also consider breaking up learners based on time zone and availability. To promote collaboration, provide groups with private discussion areas within Canvas and offer guidance on how to work collaboratively online. Online learners can present material by sending in a PowerPoint with audio files or connecting synchronously through videoconferencing (Zoom). When evaluating, provide individual and group grades.
Projects and Reports
When assigning reports, consider breaking your paper up into smaller “chunks” with intermediate deadlines, and use rubrics to set clear expectations. Consider using peer feedback for early report drafts. If grading gets overwhelming, consider audio feedback or 1:1 meetings.
Discussion boards like the Canvas “Discussions” tool or Piazza offer a great way to answer learner questions and stimulate peer-to-peer interaction. It is important to establish clear guidelines if you intend to evaluate discussion board postings as part of the grade.
Capstone projects provide learners the opportunity to gain real-world experience as part of their course grade. Contact NexusDesign@umich.edu for more information.
Nexus recommends the use of tablets for grading coursework electronically. The instructional team or graders must supply their own laptop to use the tablet for grading. Markup software is also required; Nexus recommends Adobe Acrobat Pro, which is available to instructors at no cost through ITS as part of Adobe Creative Cloud.
Canvas’ SpeedGrader feature makes it easy to evaluate assignments and provide timely written, audio, and video feedback. To learn more about using SpeedGrader, click here.
Gradescope is a suite of tools designed to accommodate a common grading workflow. Learners scan and upload their homework or exams, and the instructional team creates a living rubric that allows for speedy grading of large courses. The software allows learners to receive faster and more detailed feedback on their work, and instructors can see detailed assignment and question analytics. Visit our Gradescope page for more information and to get access.
Rubrics provide clear guidelines for how submissions will be graded, and are often seen as more objective to learners. In addition, rubrics offer a more systemic approach to grading/feedback and consistency across graders. Both Canvas and GradeScope offer convenient rubric functionality
Supporting Academic Integrity
The Engineering Honor Code has been in place at the University for more than 100 years. This page offers advice, strategies, and resources for supporting academic integrity in an online environment. For questions or concerns about an Honor Code case, contact the Honor Council Administrator at firstname.lastname@example.org. The Office of Retention & Academic Support Services website also offers resources and best practices for instructors.
Should You Be Concerned About Increased Cheating in an Online Environment?
When learners are separated from one another, there is a perception that individuals will engage in deceptive behavior. This is a topic that has been explored among education researchers in an effort to ensure an academic environment that is rooted in academic integrity. Numerous studies suggest that not only were the number of violations less than originally thought, but were fewer in frequency to their in-class counterparts. Still, the increase in online learning across the College is shifting views of cheating and instructors are naturally thinking more about what it really means to test learners’ knowledge and to uphold the Engineering Honor Code.
Tips for Supporting Academic Integrity
The Honor Code applies in all academic settings and should be followed. All learners are presumed to be honorable and trustworthy people. “The standards for personal integrity demanded by the Honor Code are a reflection of the standards of conduct expected of engineers,” the Honor Code reads. “These standards allow fairness among learners to ensure that no unfair advantage is gained and an equal learning opportunity is given to all learners.” To promote academic integrity and maintain the spirit and values of the Honor Code, consider the following.
DESIGN ASSESSMENTS WITH ACADEMIC INTEGRITY IN MIND
Provide Guidelines and Request Acknowledgement of the Honor Code
Every course should have a written honor policy describing the nature of allowed and disallowed collaboration within the course. To provide learners with reinforcement, consider including the relevant honor policy in every assignment and requiring learners to affirm. To maintain academic integrity, online exams must be designed and administered such that both learners and instructors have confidence in the testing process. Learners should not be tempted to violate the Honor Code out of fear they will be disadvantaged if they do not.
Consider Additional Policy Statements
In addition to an Honor Code statement, consider including policy statements in your course materials on cheat checking, the use of third-party websites and resources, sharing work, checking answers and rules for collaboration. You may also want to provide examples of what would be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
Develop Your Remote Assessment Strategy
Click here to learn how to develop an effective remote assessment strategy that promotes academic integrity.
CULTIVATE A CULTURE OF MUTUAL RESPECT AND TRUST
Establish a Caring Classroom Environment
From the outset, emphasize learning as the primary goal, promote a growth mindset to your learners (“failure is part of learning”), and reiterate that grades are not indicative of who they are as people.
Be Transparent About Norms
In your course syllabus and throughout the term, clarify the rules for collaboration, stress the rules and consequences for sharing individual assignments, and encourage learners to check with you before using an outside resource. You may even consider allowing learners to participate in in-class discussions to define cheating. Inform learners that course material should not be posted publicly without instructor permission and that course material is provided for the learners within the class only.
Reduce the Motivation or Pressure for Cheating
Communicate cheating mitigation strategies to learners, and consider necessary modifications to grading policies such that honest learners aren’t penalized by potential widespread cheating.
Trust is the cornerstone of the CoE Honor Code, including the fact that examinations are not proctored. By reiterating this trust, you can reduce anxiety among your learners and appeal to their professionalism and sense of social obligation.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FROM INSTRUCTORS
Some examples of typical violations include:
- Inappropriate collaboration: Giving or receiving help outside of an approved pre-registered partnership as defined by course policies, or taking another learner’s work with or without their permission in conflict with collaboration policies of a course.
- Inappropriate use of resources or seeking an unfair advantage: Utilizing university property or services outside of their intended use; utilizing tools or technology to gain an unfair advantage outside of approved resources for a class.
- Copying and plagiarism: Stealing or taking the work of another learner without their explicit permission, submitting work that is not the original thoughts or ideas of a learner without attributing its origins, or turning in the work of others.
Check study help sites like Chegg or Course Hero for existing course materials.
Each site has takedown request guides for instructors that find their course materials are being misused. Neither site tolerates plagiarism, copyright infringement, or cheating.
- To submit a Chegg takedown request, click here.
- To submit a Course Hero takedown request, click here.
Save the work you do find for cheat detection, comparison, and as an evidence item for future Honor Code case reporting.
This may be an indicator that it’s time to mix things up and develop a new assignment.
As a best practice, having multiple/new assignments, exams, and tests in use are shown to reduce cheating.
Tip: A formal Honor Code case is not possible without finite evidence out of fairness to all parties involved.
No. Per current Honor Code policy, “The Honor Code holds that learners are honorable and trustworthy people and encourages them to behave with integrity in all phases of university life. During examinations, the instructor is available for questions, but the examination is not proctored.”
Trust in our learners is a cornerstone of the current Honor Code. In Winter 2019, the College sought to review the support of our historic model of conducting exams with our current learners. Only a small minority of learners wanted to add proctoring.
When learners were given the opportunity to further explain their answers, they repeated themes relating to not only appreciating the trust of the current model, but also that the lack of proctors reduced test anxiety and provided an experience mirroring a more professional setting.
The College of Engineering does allow the use of third-party vendors to help administer an exam. These would serve the same basic functions as provided by in-person course staff, such as distributing a test, timed access to test materials, and collection of the completed test.
Communicate expectations frequently! This is the best way to reduce the number of cases.
Using ENGR 101 as a test population, the College found that incoming freshmen who had received a 25-minute Honor Code presentation were far less likely to engage in inappropriate activities. There was a 60% drop in alleged Honor Code violations in the Fall ‘19 term compared to the Fall ‘18 term.
Talk to your department head about concerns. Unfortunately, the Honor Council team does not have the capacity to assist in this way and must remain neutral in the interactions between the accusers and respondents.
Conversations About The Honor Code
Presented by W. George Sprague, Assistant Director of the Office of Retention and Academic Support Services